J-statistic in GMM
-
atbui
- Posts: 8
- Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2010 11:27 pm
J-statistic in GMM
Hi all
Can anyone explain me the J-statistic when using GMM model. For example. I am running GMM
instruments x1 x2 x3 x4
Linreg(inst, optimalweights) y
# constant x1
The significant level of J is, for example, 0.72 is good or not?
Thank you very much
Can anyone explain me the J-statistic when using GMM model. For example. I am running GMM
instruments x1 x2 x3 x4
Linreg(inst, optimalweights) y
# constant x1
The significant level of J is, for example, 0.72 is good or not?
Thank you very much
-
TomDoan
- Posts: 7825
- Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 4:36 pm
Re: J-statistic in GMM
That would indicate that you have a compatible set of instruments. The model is fit using the "optimal" weighting on the instruments, which sets those linear combinations of conditions to zero, but to get a .72 significance level, the remaining linear combinations are close to zero as well.
-
atbui
- Posts: 8
- Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2010 11:27 pm
Re: J-statistic in GMM
Thank you very much Tom. Anyways, could you please advise me the critical p-value of J-statistic to pass the Hansen J-test?TomDoan wrote:That would indicate that you have a compatible set of instruments. The model is fit using the "optimal" weighting on the instruments, which sets those linear combinations of conditions to zero, but to get a .72 significance level, the remaining linear combinations are close to zero as well.
-
TomDoan
- Posts: 7825
- Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 4:36 pm
Re: J-statistic in GMM
It's not a particularly powerful test (particularly when the degree of overidentification is high), so the conventional .05 might be a bit too stringent. I'd probably be a bit concerned if it were less than .10.