Page 1 of 1
Chan Karolyi Longstaff Sanders JOF 1992
Posted: Mon Apr 29, 2013 1:04 pm
by TomDoan
The following is a replication of the estimation of various interest rate models by GMM from Chan, Karolyi, Longstaff and Sanders(1992), "An Empirical Comparison of Models of the Short-Term Interest Rate",
Journal of Finance, vol 47, no 3, 1209-1227. Note that the model, while estimated with monthly data, uses a parameterization which annualizes the rates. This includes two versions for the estimation; one which uses the weighting scheme from the original paper, the other uses a common weighting scheme computed under the just-identified specification.
- ckls.rpf
- Original estimation method
- (5.4 KiB) Downloaded 1047 times
- rates.txt
- Data file
- (5.4 KiB) Downloaded 1343 times
Structural break test for CKLS
Posted: Mon Feb 29, 2016 1:28 pm
by Paradox4412w
Mr Doan kindly recreated the Chan, Karolyi, Longstaff and Sanders (1992) nested model test for short-term interest rates.
I want to include a dummy variable test for monetary regime changes.
Any suggestions??????
Re: Chan Karolyi Longstaff Sanders JOF 1992
Posted: Mon Feb 29, 2016 1:47 pm
by TomDoan
Doesn't ckls.rpf include a dummy variable shift?
Re: Chan Karolyi Longstaff Sanders JOF 1992
Posted: Wed Mar 02, 2016 7:48 pm
by Paradox4412w
It does! I am going blind running CDS models!
Re: Chan Karolyi Longstaff Sanders JOF 1992
Posted: Wed Sep 28, 2016 1:29 pm
by Paradox4412w
Tom:
I tried to replicate CKLS structural break test using your code, but it is different (can't verify CKLS finds on page 1223, Table 5. Using your data and code.
Any suggestions?
Re: Chan Karolyi Longstaff Sanders JOF 1992
Posted: Wed Sep 28, 2016 2:40 pm
by TomDoan
Thanks for pointing that out. The variance formula wasn't right. It should be
frml varianced = epsd(t)^2-(sigmasq+sigmasqd*dummy)/12.0*r^(2*(gamma+gammad*dummy))
(it was using EPS(T)^2 rather than EPSD(T)^2). I fixed the two attachments in the original post.
Re: Chan Karolyi Longstaff Sanders JOF 1992
Posted: Wed Sep 28, 2016 7:46 pm
by Paradox4412w
Getting closer.
For the unrestricted model, the second dummy BETAD in ckls is -0.0751 while RATS generates -0.751436998. Also, the papers ChiSQ is 2.2939 while RATS generates 2.8494.
Re: Chan Karolyi Longstaff Sanders JOF 1992
Posted: Fri Nov 04, 2016 12:48 pm
by Paradox4412w
Tom, do you think your code revisions are correct for the dummy variable test? If so, this implies that the dummy variable test (from Gauss) in the original CKLS JF paper is incorrect. Correct?
Re: Chan Karolyi Longstaff Sanders JOF 1992
Posted: Fri Nov 04, 2016 6:40 pm
by TomDoan
They both could be "correct". Non-linear IV with iterated weight matrices can end up with different weights, which will produce different test statistics.
Re: Chan Karolyi Longstaff Sanders JOF 1992
Posted: Sun Nov 06, 2016 10:15 am
by Paradox4412w
Excellent point! Thanks. Just ran several with different weightings and confirmed that.