BVAR long-run + sign restrictions
Posted: Fri Nov 07, 2014 11:43 am
Dear Tom,
I am estimating a Bayesian VAR where my aim is twofold
1. I want an estimate of potential output
2. I want to assess the effects of other shocks on output
Basically, I am trying to extend this paper by Luca Benati
https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecolet/v1 ... 3-119.html
to allow for other shocks beyond technology.
Since I am using a Blanchard-Quah decomposition, my first try was doing it by using Bjornland - Leitemo (JME, 2009, Rats example) code.
However, I was wondering whether you have some suggestions to achieve identification of other shocks through sign restrictions, preserving the first one by using the conventional long-run one.
I hope this is not too confusing. In a nutshell: can I run a RATS code in which I combine BQ and Uhlig methodology?
Best regards,
KOBE
I am estimating a Bayesian VAR where my aim is twofold
1. I want an estimate of potential output
2. I want to assess the effects of other shocks on output
Basically, I am trying to extend this paper by Luca Benati
https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecolet/v1 ... 3-119.html
to allow for other shocks beyond technology.
Since I am using a Blanchard-Quah decomposition, my first try was doing it by using Bjornland - Leitemo (JME, 2009, Rats example) code.
However, I was wondering whether you have some suggestions to achieve identification of other shocks through sign restrictions, preserving the first one by using the conventional long-run one.
I hope this is not too confusing. In a nutshell: can I run a RATS code in which I combine BQ and Uhlig methodology?
Best regards,
KOBE