Dueker (1997) output
Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2012 9:27 am
Dear Tom(s)
Following your previous advice, I have included Dueker's (1997) MS GARCH (with a switching normalisation factor) in my current study as a sharper alternative to Gray(1996).
As part of the assessment, I am trying to measure forecasting performance of the various models. The problem that I'm having with the Dueker model is that it produces impossibly high variance estimates (on average about 50 to 100 times as high as the observed squared residual). Specifically, the hs(DFFilterSize) series, which are supposed to provide a measure of the variance in each regime, don't seem to be related to the actual scale of the data. This is not easily seen because the coefficient estimates seem realistic.
This problem occurs using both the replication file example and my own data.
Please let me know if I'm missing something.
Thank you for any help offered.
Regards,
Daniel King
Following your previous advice, I have included Dueker's (1997) MS GARCH (with a switching normalisation factor) in my current study as a sharper alternative to Gray(1996).
As part of the assessment, I am trying to measure forecasting performance of the various models. The problem that I'm having with the Dueker model is that it produces impossibly high variance estimates (on average about 50 to 100 times as high as the observed squared residual). Specifically, the hs(DFFilterSize) series, which are supposed to provide a measure of the variance in each regime, don't seem to be related to the actual scale of the data. This is not easily seen because the coefficient estimates seem realistic.
This problem occurs using both the replication file example and my own data.
Please let me know if I'm missing something.
Thank you for any help offered.
Regards,
Daniel King