ENDERSSIKLOS—Asymmetric error correction

Use this forum to post complete RATS "procedures". Please be sure to include instructions on using the procedure and detailed references where applicable.
TomDoan
Posts: 7814
Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 4:36 pm

ENDERSSIKLOS—Asymmetric error correction

Unread post by TomDoan »

@EndersSiklos does various types of the unit root regressions with threshold breaks on the residuals from an Engle-Granger cointegrating regression (assumed to be done already---input are the residuals). A related procedure for threshold unit roots is @EndersGranger.

Detailed description

For an example, see Enders and Siklos(2001), "Cointegration and Threshold Adjustment," JBES, vol. 19, no. 2, 166-76.
challenges
Posts: 11
Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 12:29 pm

Re: ENDERSSIKLOS - Asymmetric error correction

Unread post by challenges »

Dear Tom,

Could you please tell me whether in the EndersSiklos procedure, the unit root tests may be done on the residuals stemming from a long-run relationship that would have been previously estimated with DOLS, rather than OLS?
Thank you a lot for your reply.
TomDoan
Posts: 7814
Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 4:36 pm

Re: ENDERSSIKLOS - Asymmetric error correction

Unread post by TomDoan »

I don't see any reason why they couldn't.
challenges
Posts: 11
Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 12:29 pm

Re: ENDERSSIKLOS - Asymmetric error correction

Unread post by challenges »

TomDoan wrote:I don't see any reason why they couldn't.
Dear Tom,
Thank you for your quick reply. Would it then be correct to use the critical values of the paper of Enders and Siklos (2001) for the unit root tests performed on the residuals stemming from the long-run relationship that would have been previously estimated with DOLS?

Moreover, could you please tell me if I should change the ECM representation in order to remain consistant with the use of the DOLS estimator in the long-run relationship, or may the ECM remain the same as in the paper of Enders and Siklos (2001)?

Thank you for your help.
TomDoan
Posts: 7814
Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 4:36 pm

Re: ENDERSSIKLOS - Asymmetric error correction

Unread post by TomDoan »

challenges wrote:
TomDoan wrote:I don't see any reason why they couldn't.
Dear Tom,
Thank you for your quick reply. Would it then be correct to use the critical values of the paper of Enders and Siklos (2001) for the unit root tests performed on the residuals stemming from the long-run relationship that would have been previously estimated with DOLS?

Moreover, could you please tell me if I should change the ECM representation in order to remain consistant with the use of the DOLS estimator in the long-run relationship, or may the ECM remain the same as in the paper of Enders and Siklos (2001)?

Thank you for your help.
I'm not sure whether the critical values would change. The critical values are generated by Monte Carlo using the prescribed method. While one would suspect that the difference between methods of estimating the cointegrating vector would be minor compared to the sources of randomness, it would probably be necessary to redo the simulations to tell for sure.
Post Reply