Time Varying Parameter model

Questions and discussions on Time Series Analysis
ivory4
Posts: 144
Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 12:16 pm

Re: Time Varying Parameter model (was "About DLM Instruction")

Unread post by ivory4 »

The program I am running is working very well at the beginning, but if I continue to run the same program many many times(why I need to do this?I just change minor settings in the graph part), later it run into this problem.
It could be solved if I restart Rats.
TomDoan wrote:However, if you run part of a program, you might start at a spot which leaves some variable uninitialized or set to a value from later in the program when it needs the values from the start.
ivory4
Posts: 144
Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 12:16 pm

Re: Time Varying Parameter model (was "About DLM Instruction")

Unread post by ivory4 »

For a TVP model, discount is assigned at the begining, what would be the formula for calculating Prior W and V (given either W or V is chosen, EXACT option is used)?
pls
Posts: 19
Joined: Sat Mar 22, 2014 2:24 pm

Re: Time Varying Parameter model

Unread post by pls »

What if the dependent variable and the independent variable are estimated with error so that there is an errors in variables problem? Is there any method of handling this in DLM?
TomDoan
Posts: 7814
Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 4:36 pm

Re: Time Varying Parameter model

Unread post by TomDoan »

In a time-varying parameters model?

As is typical, errors in Y are easy since they just turn into part of the measurement error. Errors in "X" are often handled through state-space models since they offer a way to deal with dynamic latent variables. However, if you have both errors in X and in the coefficients on X, you end up with a multiplicative combination of the errors, so it can't be done with a simple DLM. Instead, it needs some form of extended Kalman filter.
pls
Posts: 19
Joined: Sat Mar 22, 2014 2:24 pm

Re: Time Varying Parameter model

Unread post by pls »

TomDoan wrote:In a time-varying parameters model?

As is typical, errors in Y are easy since they just turn into part of the measurement error. Errors in "X" are often handled through state-space models since they offer a way to deal with dynamic latent variables. However, if you have both errors in X and in the coefficients on X, you end up with a multiplicative combination of the errors, so it can't be done with a simple DLM. Instead, it needs some form of extended Kalman filter.
Thanks. That helps me a lot.
Post Reply