Strengths and Weaknesses of Box Jenk, Dickey Fuller & Garch

Econometrics questions and discussions

Strengths and Weaknesses of Box Jenk, Dickey Fuller & Garch

Postby economicsstudent » Tue Apr 03, 2012 5:30 am

n/a
Last edited by economicsstudent on Wed Apr 11, 2012 4:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.
economicsstudent
 
Posts: 7
Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2012 10:00 am

Re: Strengths and Weaknesses of Box Jenk, Dickey Fuller & Ga

Postby TomDoan » Tue Apr 03, 2012 9:54 am

For doing what, and compared to what? And what is a BoxJenkins test?
TomDoan
 
Posts: 2720
Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 5:36 pm

Re: Strengths and Weaknesses of Box Jenk, Dickey Fuller & Ga

Postby economicsstudent » Tue Apr 03, 2012 3:40 pm

For testing efficiency. And when I say the Box Jenk, I mean the BJIDENT procedure in RATS.
economicsstudent
 
Posts: 7
Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2012 10:00 am

Re: Strengths and Weaknesses of Box Jenk, Dickey Fuller & Ga

Postby TomDoan » Wed Apr 04, 2012 11:49 am

economicsstudent wrote:For testing efficiency. And when I say the Box Jenk, I mean the BJIDENT procedure in RATS.


What's your null hypothesis and what's your alternative? If you know what those are, and compare them with what those tests are doing, then you will have much of your answer. For instance, if your null is that log X follows a random walk with increments of common variance, then the simplest form of the D-F test does have that as the null. However, the alternative in the D-F test is that log X is a stationary autoregression. That's never the alternative in the EMH. And log X having common variance increments may be stronger than you should be assuming. So the null is wrong and the alternative is wrong, so it's probably not a good choice for what you're trying to test.
TomDoan
 
Posts: 2720
Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 5:36 pm


Return to General Econometrics

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests