question about maxl option of boxjenk

Use this forum for posting example programs or short bits of sample code.

question about maxl option of boxjenk

Postby hardmann » Sat Jun 16, 2012 10:38 am

Dear Tom:

I still replicate paper of Morley, Nelson & Zivot(2003), "Why Are the Beveridge-Nelson and Unobserved-Components Decompositions of GDP So Different?,"
I encounter a new question.
The boxjenk code used is "boxjenk(maxl,ar=2,diffs=1,ma=2,const) lgdp" .
Without maxl option, the result is different, so BN decomposition is also different. While I use boxjenk with maxl option to other dataset, the model does not converge, but default specification is ok. I also review reference manual but no answer.

Best regard.
Hardmann.
hardmann
 
Posts: 48
Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2011 10:49 pm

Re: question about maxl option of boxjenk

Postby moderator » Mon Jun 18, 2012 1:38 pm

In the User's Guide, we note that the MAXL method is more sensitive to problems with initial conditions, particularly with models that may be difficult to fit as in this case.

Try using the conditional least squares estimates as initial values for the MAXL estimation. For example:

boxjenk(ar=2,diffs=1,ma=2,const) lgdp
compute coeffs = %beta
boxjenk(maxl,ar=2,diffs=1,ma=2,const,initial=coeffs) lgdp

Regards,
Tom Maycock
Estima
moderator
Site Admin
 
Posts: 306
Joined: Thu Oct 19, 2006 4:33 pm


Return to Examples and Sample Code

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest